Some people seem to think that it leads to nitpicking about inconsequential issues, and that the men who defend and try to enforce it find their most delightful occupation in fighting about small matters, and exhibit great bigotry and narrow-mindedness in bringing the authority of God and the testimony of Scripture to bear upon such a number of paltry points. This is because the principle has been often brought out in connection with the discussion of matters which, viewed in themselves, are not that important, such as rites and ceremonies, vestments and organs, crossings, kneelings, bowings, and other such foolishness.
Because the English Puritans and the Scottish Presbyterians held to the regulative principle, many people have been led to entertain such views of them.
Now, it should be quite sufficient to prevent or neutralize this impression to show, as we think can be done, 1st, That the principle is taught with sufficient plainness in Scripture, and that, therefore, it ought to be professed and applied to the regulation of ecclesiastical affairs.
In the second place, the principle is in no way unsuitable to the dignity of the church as a divine institution, giving to God His rightful place of supremacy, and to the church, as the body of Christ, its rightful position of elevated simplicity and purity. It is large, liberal, and comprehensive, such as seems in no way unbecoming its Divine author.
Thirdly, when seen in connection with the purposes of the church, it is completely agreeable with everything suggested by a knowledgeable and thorough survey of the tendencies of human nature as well as the testimony of history.
Regarding the connection referred to above, on which the perception we are disputing is chiefly based, it is certainly plain that, in so far as it exists, this is not owing to anything in the tendencies of the principle itself or its advocates. Rather, it is because of the conduct of the men who, in defiance of this principle, would impose human inventions into the government and worship of the church, or who insist upon retaining them permanently after they have once got entrance into the church.
No rites or ceremonies, no schemes or arrangements are suggested by the regulative principle. It is purely negative and prohibitionary. Its advocates never concoct innovations and impose them upon the church. The principle itself prohibits this. It is the deniers of this principle, and they alone, who invent and impose innovations. Therefore they are responsible for all the harm that ensues from the controversy to which these things have led. (Adapted from "The Reformers and the Theology of the Reformation" by William Cunningham.)
Biblical Worship: The Regulative Principle of Worship in History
About the Author:
For additional information about the regulative principle of worship and/or Presbyterianism, please visit PuritanDownloads.com. There are many sound Reformed theology resources at that site.
